Questionnaire

This Questionnaire forms part of the research to be undertaken for the HEFCE’s Leadership, Governance and Management Funded project involving the use of dispute resolution processes and procedures within HEIs.

If you are willing to help with our initial survey of current practice, we should very much appreciate your help in completing answers to as many of the questions as possible. The Questionnaire may be completed on-line, with the assistance of one of the project team visiting your institution, or a mixture of both.

For the convenience of those with particular areas of responsibility we suggest below routes through short sections of the Questionnaire.

Interested individuals completing it online may also wish to use the shortcuts.

If there are any questions that you cannot answer in a section you complete, please put "DON'T KNOW" in the box rather than leave it blank.


Please indicate whether you are responding from a:

Chartered university
Post-1992 Statutory Corporation
Civil Corporation (Oxford or Cambridge)
Oxford or Cambridge College
FE College providing HE in FE

If you are willing to identify your institution please do so below. No attributable information will be used without consent except for statistical purposes and in anonymised form.

Sections of the Questionnaire

SECTION I YOUR CURRENT DISPUTE RESOLUTION SYSTEM
SECTION II CATEGORIES OF DISPUTE
SECTION III REPRESENTATION
SECTION IV COSTS
SECTION V PATTERN OF DISPUTES AT INSTITUTION
SECTION VI STAFF DEVELOPMENT TRAINING IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Please indicate whether you are responding:

In a personal capacity
On behalf of your institution

Please indicate whether you are answering with:

Knowledge of the institution as a whole
Knowledge restricted to a particular area or kind of dispute

Please indicate how you are responding:

Are you a member of the HEI’s Senior Management, or Executive?
Please answer: S1, S2 C+E, S3, S4, S5, S6
q1
Are you a member of a Personnel or HR Department or equivalent?
Please answer: S1, S2 B, S3, S4, S5, S6
q2
Are you a senior member of Academic Staff, eg Dean, Head of School, or with significant line-management responsibility?
Please answer: S1, S2 A, S3, S4
q3
Are you a member of Academic Staff?
Please answer: S2 A, S3
q4
Are you a member of Non-Academic, Academic-related, Computing, Laboratory Assistant or Support Staff?
Please answer: S2 B, S3
q5
Are you a Student Union Representative, Sabbatical Officer, Registrar, or other dealing with student matters?
Please answer: S2 C, S3
q6
Are you a Trade Union Representative?
Please answer: S1, S2 D, S3, S4
q7
Are you linked with an HEI in a collaborative enture or responsible within your HEI for setting up or running collaborative courses or projects with other bodies or institutions?
Please answer: S2 E, S4, S5, S6
q8

SECTION I Your current dispute resolution system ( q1 q2 q3 q7 )

Question I.1

Do you refer to and/or make use of the ARMED* guidelines in designing your dispute resolution Procedures?

Yes No

*Active Risk Management in Higher Education (http://armed.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/)

Question I.2

What principles underlie the design of your complaint, grievance and disciplinary procedures and any other dispute resolution procedures you have created?

Question I.3

How frequently are your dispute resolution, complaint, grievance, disciplinary and any other resolution procedures revised?

i) Regularly State interval

ii) Reactively

a) In response to changes in the law
b) When you have had a dispute

Question I.4

Who or which department is responsible in your institution for coordinating revision of dispute resolution procedures?

Question I.5

If you are a chartered university or an ancient university, have you adopted the revised Model Statute?

Yes No n/a

Question I.6

Are your dispute, complaint, grievance, disciplinary and any other ‘dispute resolution’ procedures available or accessible on the internet?

Yes If Yes please provide URL:

No If No, how are students and staff made aware of them?

Question I.7

Does your institution make the current dispute, complaint, grievance, disciplinary and other procedures available on request?

Yes No (If Yes may we have a copy? Yes No )

Question I.8

How would an enquirer find out how to make a request to see your procedures and know which ‘procedures’ to ask for?

Question I.9

How may the current dispute, complaint, grievance, disciplinary and other procedures be accessed by:

i) Members of staff

ii) External enquirers interested in entering into partnership with your institution or funding research in your institution


SECTION II Categories of dispute ( q3 q4 )

Part A: Academic Staff

Question II.A.1

Do you believe that disputes, complaints, grievances and disciplinary procedures are identified at an early stage?

Yes No

If yes, how?

Question II.A.2

Are you encouraged to report concerns relating to minor issues involving disputes and complaints to line managers?

Yes No

If yes, how is this done and how is confidentiality protected?

Question II.A.3

Are all relevant sections/departments/divisions/faculties of your institution made aware of disputes which may be relevant to them?

Yes No

If yes, how is this done and how is confidentiality protected?

Question II.A.4

Is any staff development training in the handling of disputes, complaints, grievances and disciplinary matters available for staff?

Yes No

If yes, please give brief details.

Question II.A.5

Is it a condition of holding a line-management position that training in all the dispute resolution procedures available in the institution should be undertaken?

Yes No

If yes, is it a requirement that the training is kept up to date? Yes No


SECTION II Categories of dispute ( q2 q5 )

Part B: Non-academic, academic-related, computing, laboratory, assistant and support staff.

Question II.B.1

Do you believe that disputes, complaints, grievances and disciplinary procedures are identified at an early stage?

Yes No

If yes, how?

Question II.B.2

Are you encouraged to report concerns relating to minor issues involving disputes and complaints to line managers?

Yes No

If yes, how is this done and how is confidentiality protected?

Question II.B.3

Are all relevant sections/departments/divisions/faculties of your institution made aware of disputes which may be relevant to them?

Yes No

If yes, how is this done and how is confidentiality protected?

Question II.B.4

Is any staff development training relating to the handling of disputes, complaints, grievances and disciplinary matters made available for staff?

Yes No

If yes, please give brief details.

Question II.B.5

Is it a condition of holding a line-management position that training in all the dispute resolution procedures available in the institution should be undertaken?

Yes No

If yes is it a requirement that the training is kept up to date?

Yes No


SECTION II Categories of dispute ( q1 q6 )

Part C: STUDENTS’ REPRESENTATIVES, SABBATICAL OFFICERS, REGISTRAR OR OTHER, DEALING WITH STUDENT MATTERS

Question II.C.1

How may the current dispute, complaint, grievance, disciplinary and other procedures be accessed by:

i) Prospective Students

ii) Current Students

iii) Students on courses elsewhere which may ultimately be counted towards qualifications awarded by your institution

Question II.C.2

How are student disputes brought to the attention of the Institution?

Question II.C.3

Are you aware of the student complaints procedures available in your institution?

Yes No

If yes, do you consider them to be effective?

Yes No

If no, briefly explain why not?

Question II.C.4

Does your institution tell students that they may approach the Office of the Independent Adjudicator (OIA) if internal procedures are exhausted and they are not satisfied?

Yes No

If yes, please give brief details.

Question II.C.5

Do you know of any student complaints which have been taken to the OIA to date?

Yes No Don't know

If yes, please indicate how many.

Less than 2 Between 2 and 4 More than 4

Question II.C.6

Are you aware of any complaints against your institution being upheld by the OIA?

Yes No Don't know

If yes, to which area(s) did the complaint (s) relate?

Question II.C.7

Does your institution tend to instruct solicitors or barristers to defend the institution or members of staff in connection with student complaints?

Yes No

Does your institution provide equivalent legal support for students at its own expense?

Yes No Don't know

Question II.C.8

What do you estimate has been the percentage of your time spent as a student union representative in dealing with disputes, complaints, grievances and disciplinary matters etc.,

Question II.C.9

Please indicate how many disputes arising in the last two years that you are aware of have been concerned with:

Dispute relating to: 0 1-5 6-10 11-15 16+
Admissions
Award of Bursaries
The Student Contract
Student accommodation
Unpaid fees
Part Time students
Overseas students
Mature students
Students who are single parents
Assessment and award levels and other academic judgment matters
Disability issues
Cultural and religious issues
Discrimination
Students who are also employees
Student complaints relating to employees of your HEI
Student counselling
Quality of teaching
Qualifications of staff
Staff availability to see students
Timetabling issues/rooming
Library/Learning Resource Issues
Communication/accuracy of award results

SECTION II Categories of dispute ( q7 )

Part D: Trade Unions

Question II.D.1

Which employee unions are recognized at your institution? Please list the names in full.

Question II.D.2

Do you have union representatives on your institutional committees?

Yes No

Please list these committees

Question II.D.3

Is amendment to your employment dispute procedures a matter which is undertaken in consultation/negotiation between unions and representatives of the institution?

Yes No

If no, please state (as far as you know) who is involved in such drafting and/or amendments of the dispute resolution procedures.

Question II.D.4

Is mediation used/made available in your institution as a means of settling disputes?

Yes No

If No, you will not be able to answer Questions 5, 6 and 7.

Question II.D.5

Has there been any use of mediation involving union accompaniment of member(s) of staff?

Yes No

If yes, which unions have provided such accompaniment?

Question II.D.6

Has such accompaniment of union members in a mediated dispute been provided at any of the following levels:

None
As a lay representative
As a full-time official
As a lawyer
Other

If ‘other’, please explain the capacity.

Question II.D.7

Are there any differences in your institution’s approach to mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution undertaken in the case of:

i) an employee with access to union representation
ii) an employee with other representation
iii) an employee attending unrepresented?

Yes No

If yes, please provide brief details.


SECTION II Categories of dispute ( q1 q8 )

PART E COLLABORATIVE COURSES AND OTHER COLLABORATIVE VENTURES

Question II.E.1

Do you have a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or some other contractual document which sets out procedures for the resolution of any disputes, complaints, grievances and disciplinary matters concerning your own students or employees or those of your partner arising within your own HEI, and identifies the jurisdiction within which any dispute would be subject to litigation?

Yes No

Question II.E.2

If yes, are students and employees informed of the existence of these procedures and given copies as soon as they begin a course, research project or other venture involving your partner?

Question II.E.3

Are there circumstances in which the partner body or institution’s procedures for dealing with disputes, complaints, grievances etc, would apply to your students or employees rather than your own procedures?

Yes No

If yes, please describe the circumstances and the way in which students and employees are made aware which procedures apply at any given time when they are working on a joint course, research project or in a collaborative venture.

If no, please indicate how your own procedures have been adapted to cover students and employees involved in collaborative ventures.

Question II.E.4

Are all your responsible staff in relevant sections/departments/divisions made aware of the Quality Assurance Agency’s revised Code of Practice, Section 5 on academic appeals and student complaints on academic matters'?

Yes No

Question II.E.5

Do you ensure that all responsible staff in relevant sections/departments/divisions of the partner body or institution are made aware of disputes arising within or in connection with the collaborative venture?

Question II.E.6

What staff development training and information relating to procedures for the handling of disputes, complaints, grievances and disciplinary matters arising in collaborative ventures is available for your staff?

Question II.E.7

What procedures exist in your institution to ensure that these issues are raised with prospective partners when a joint course, research project or other venture is proposed?


SECTION III REPRESENTATION ( q1 q2 q3 q4 q5 q6 q7 )

Question III.1

Are people usually represented during disputes by:

Lawyer
Union Representative
Colleague
‘Friend’
Themselves
Member of Personnel
Other

If ‘other’, please specify:

Question III.2

Do you have a campus Ombudsmen?

Yes No

If Yes, do they represent staff, students or both?

Staff Students Both

Question III.3

Do you have a Counselling Service?

Yes No

If Yes, please explain briefly how they work within the dispute resolution system.

Question III.4

Is there a process/procedure for ensuring that confidentiality is maintained when resolving disputes at your institution?

Yes No

If yes, please explain briefly how.


SECTION IV COSTS ( q1 q2 q3 q7 q8 )

Question IV.1

Who is authorized to approve expenditure of legal fees on resolution/settlement of disputes in your institution?

Question IV.2

Is there a limit at which further approval must be sought before further expenditure is authorized?

Yes No

If yes, what is the limit: £

Question IV.3

Does the institution have in-house lawyers/legal department?

Yes No

If yes, how many salaried legally-qualified individuals?

Are they specialists in particular areas of law relating to your institution's affairs eg, estates, employment?

Yes No

Question IV.4

Does the institution instruct external lawyers to represent the institution?

Yes No

Question IV.5

If you use an external law firm for disputes how do they bill:

Monthly by hours recorded
At the conclusion of the matter by hours recorded
By fixed fee
Otherwise/a mixture of the above (please give details)

Question IV.6

How is legal expenditure divided between any in-house lawyers and solicitors or barristers instructed by the institution?

Question IV.7

What is the range of typical legal costs to the institution at the date of settlement of an employment dispute £

Question IV.8

What is the range of typical legal costs to the institution at the date of settlement of a student dispute? £

Question IV.9

Does your HEI attempt to quantify the costs of disputes in administrative time?

Yes No

Question IV.10

Does your HEI 's indemnity Insurance cover senior staff?

Yes No

In what circumstances would legal costs be paid for senior staff by your HEI?


SECTION V PATTERN OF DISPUTES AT INSTITUTION ( q1 q2 q8 )

Question V.1

How many disputes arising in the last two years have been concerned with the following:

Type of dispute: 0 1-5 6-10 11+
Equal opportunities
Sexual discrimination
Racial discrimination
Disability discrimination
Health & Safety
Disputes between staff
Disputes relating to staff and students
Disputes between students
Disputes relating to external bodies
Employees who are also students
Research funding and income generation
Intellectual Property Rights
Complaints from students studying abroad
Complaints from EU students
Complaints from International students
Estate matters
Parking
Disputes arising in connection with innovative international collaborative ventures eg overseas campus arrangements, transnational and partnership agreements
Multi-party disputes
Multi-jurisdictional disputes

Question V.2

Did your institution instruct lawyers, solicitors or barristers in connection to any of these disputes/complaints?

Yes No

Question V.3

How many employment disputes have gone to an Employment Tribunal in each of the last two academic years across the whole institution?

2004 to 2005

Less than 5
Between 6 and 15
Between 16 and 25
Between 26 and 35
More than 35

2005 to 2006

Less than 5
Between 6 and 15
Between 16 and 25
Between 26 and 35
More than 35

Question V.4

How many employment disputes have been settled before they were taken to an Employment Tribunal?

2004 to 2005

Less than 5
Between 6 and 15
Between 16 and 25
Between 26 and 35
More than 35

2005 to 2006

Less than 5
Between 6 and 15
Between 16 and 25
Between 26 and 35
More than 35

Question V.5

How long, on average did the disputes last from the first notification of the complaint/dispute arising to settlement or conclusion?

Question V.6

Are you seeing an increase in particular types of employment dispute?

Yes No

If yes in which?

Question V.7

How often are the following included in the resolution of a dispute:

(i) Continuation of employment, student or contractual relationship on agreed terms

Sometimes Always Never

(ii) Amending a process which is agreed to have caused a dispute

Sometimes Always Never

(iii) Financial compensation for loss

Sometimes Always Never

(iv) Apologies

Sometimes Always Never

(v) Reform and improvement in the way the institution deals with disputes

Sometimes Always Never

(vi) Provision of feedback to the institution designed to assist it to avoid similar disputes in the future

Sometimes Always Never


SECTION VI Training ( q1 q2 q8 )

Question VI.1

Is there training for University staff in dispute resolution?

Yes No

Question VI.2

If the University does provide training for staff in dispute resolution:

a. Who is this training for e.g. academic staff, HR staff, senior management?

b. Who is the training provided by?

c. For whom ( if anybody) is this training compulsory and are up-dating sessions held?

d. What does this training consist of? e.g. how long is it, what subjects does it cover, is this training generic or is it related to any particular field or fields of dispute within Universities?

Question VI.3

Irrespective of whether the University currently provides training in dispute resolution do you think such training is likely to be useful and if so who should be trained and what should the training consist of?