|
|
|
 |
Welcome
to the Embedding Threshold Concepts website |
 |
|
| Home
> Working Papers and
Readings |
|
|
|
|
|
Embedding Threshold
Concepts - Working Papers and Readings
|
|
Working
Papers
Publications
from the Project
Related publications |
|
|
Working Papers
|
|
|
Working Paper 1
Threshold
Concepts: how can we recognise them?
(pdf document)
Peter Davies
Abstract A threshold
concept is defined by Meyer and Land (2003)
as possessing the following qualities: transformative,
integrative, bounded, and probably irreversible.
This concept provides a promising way of
interpreting the learning demand presented
by subjects and Meyer and Land have begun
to apply the idea in analysing learning
economics. It redefines the familiar idea
of a 'powerful concept' in a social constructivist
context, providing a penetrating tool for
the analysis of the development of discipline
specific learning. This paper examines some
difficulties to be faced in the operationalisation
of the idea of 'threshold concepts' in economics
and, in so doing, begins to identify ways
in which these problems might be overcome.
|
|
|
Working Paper 2
Recognising
Threshold Concepts: an exploration of different
approaches (pdf document)
Peter Davies and Jean
Mangan
Abstract This working
paper briefly reviews the idea of Threshold
Concepts and considers the application
of this to the progress of learning in economics.
We suggest that a distinction between basic,
threshold discipline and modelling concepts
may be useful in determining a framework
for the identification of threshold concepts
in economics. We argue that it may be appropriate
to think in terms of a web of threshold
concepts within the subject. A range of
evidence is presented to illustrate the
existence and implications of threshold
concepts in economics.
|
|
|
Working Paper 3
Embedding
Threshold Concepts: from theory to pedagogical
principles to learning activities
(pdf document)
Peter Davies and Jean
Mangan
Abstract In this
paper we develop an account of the problems
confronting learners by blending insights
from threshold concepts and variation theory.
In particular, we use both of these ideas
to develop a coherent account of the structure
of understanding and the implications for
learning in the disciplines. On this basis
we propose four pedagogic principles and
describe three types of activity that seek
to operationalise these principles. We report
briefly on experience in using these activities
in a project 'embedding threshold concepts
in first-year undergraduate economics' in
four universities in England. We comment
on some implications of this experience.
|
|
|
Working Paper 4
Trajectories
of students' learning: threshold concepts
and subject learning careers (pdf
document)
Peter Davies and Jean
Mangan
Abstract Threshold
concepts provide a fruitful way of revisiting
the notion of 'learning careers' (Bloomer
and Hodkinson, 2000; Bloomer, 2001) in the
context of students' acquisition of the
ways of thinking and practising of a particular
discipline (McCune and Hounsell, 2005).
Most students in Higher Education are following
courses of study that induct them into the
practices of a particular discipline, field
or profession. The social context of their
learning is framed by their experience of
the particular academic community with which
they are engaging. They are 'learning biology'
or 'learning to nurse'. Threshold concepts
(Meyer and Land, 2005) offer a helpful way
of characterising the trajectories of students'
experience of learning in these contexts.
Meyer and Land (2005)
suggest that within each discipline, field
or profession there are threshold concepts
which integrate and define the scope of
the academic community with which a student
is engaging. We suggest that students' progress
towards a deepening engagement with these
communities: (1) the early stages of a subject
learning career involve the acquisition
of 'building blocks' which at that stage
cannot be understood in the way that a master
of the subject would understand them, because
the learner has not yet acquired the relevant
threshold concepts; (2) as students become
aware of threshold concepts they face a
major stage in their subject learning career,
since acquisition of a threshold concept
will help students to integrate and reinterpret
their previous learning; (3) as students
meet further threshold concepts these in
turn may transform their understanding of
threshold concepts they have previously
acquired. Students' responses to these different
aspects of their subject learning career
may have profound implications for their
progress and achievement.
|
|
|
|
|
Publications from
the Project
|
|
Davies, P.
(2006) 'Threshold Concepts: How can we recognise
them?' in J.H.F. Meyer and R. Land (Eds),
Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding:
Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge,
London: Routledge (pp.70-84).
Davies, P. and Mangan, J. (2007) 'Threshold
concepts and the integration of understanding
in economics', Studies in Higher Education
32, 6: 711-726.
Davies, P. and Mangan, J. (2007) 'Embedding
Threshold Concepts: from theory to pedagogical
principles to learning activities' in R. Land,
J.H.F. Meyer and J. Smith (Eds) Threshold
Concepts within the Disciplines. Rotterdam:
Sense Publishers
Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J.H.F. and Davies,
P. (2006) 'Conclusion: Implications of threshold
concepts for course design and evaluation'
in J.H.F. Meyer and R. Land (Eds) Overcoming
Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold
concepts and troublesome knowledge, London:
Routledge (pp195-206). |
|
|
|
|
Related publications
|
|
Davies, P.
and Dunnill, R. (2006) 'Discipline, Outcomes
and Purpose in Social Science Education',
Journal of Social Science Education
2006-2, at http://www.jsse.org/2006-/davies_dunnill_disciplines.htm.
Davies, P. and Dunnill, R. (2006) 'Improving
Learning by Focusing on Variation', Teaching
Business and Economics 10, 2: 25-31.
Davies, P. and Dunnill, R. (2008) 'Learning
Study as a model of collaborative practice
in initial teacher education', Journal
of Education for Teaching 34, 1.
Meyer J.H.F. and Land R. (Eds) (2006) Overcoming
Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold
concepts and troublesome knowledge, London:
Routledge.
Meyer, J.H.F. and Land, R. (2005) 'Threshold
concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): epistemological
considerations and a conceptual framework
for teaching and learning', Higher Education
49, 3: 373-388.
Meyer, J.H.F and Land, R. (2003) 'Threshold
Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge (1): linkages
to ways of thinking and practising within
the disciplines', Improving Student Learning
- Ten Years On, OCSLD: Oxford (pp.412-424). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|