5.1. The University will ensure that its teaching, curriculum, policies and procedures reflect its duties to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, freedom of speech and academic freedom within the law. In particular:
a) its processes for course development and approval, quality assurance and academic assessment will respect the rights of freedom of speech and academic freedom;
b) its processes for facilitating research will respect the rights of freedom of speech and academic freedom;
c) no individual will be subjected to disciplinary action or any less favourable treatment by or on behalf of the University because of the lawful exercise of freedom of speech or academic freedom; and
d) it will not restrict the exposure to students of ideas because they are controversial or unpopular or because some (or many) may find them offensive.
It should be noted that association with the University, as an academic institution and charity with the express object of advancing knowledge, education and research for the public benefit, confers a degree of authority and legitimacy on views and provides privileged access to a scholarly audience for the speakers it hosts. In assessing what is reasonably practicable to do to ensure and promote freedom of speech and academic freedom in any case, the University does not regard itself as obliged to provide a platform to individuals who wish to promote views that are manifestly at odds with its charitable objects, with empirically verifiable objective facts or not susceptible to reasoned enquiry and debate. Staff and students making decisions about invitations to speakers should always assess carefully the contribution that a discussion or event will have to the advancement of education in a university setting, and what form the event should take to best deliver that outcome. The University shall deal with any contributions or inputs regarding such assessment and or event with utmost discretion to ensure the promotion and protection of the principles relating to freedom of speech and academic freedom are upheld at all times.
5.2. The University does not enter into non-disclosure agreements related to complaints about sexual misconduct, bullying or harassment.
5.3. The University is aware that the terms of certain overseas funding, including funding from endowments, gifts, donations, research grants and contracts, and educational or commercial partnerships, from any overseas country, may present a risk to freedom of speech and academic freedom. Therefore, the University has processes in place to ensure that risks to freedom of speech or academic freedom are identified and appropriately managed.
5.4. To deliver its responsibility to promote and secure freedom of speech and academic freedom, the University shall:
a) bring the provisions of section A1 of the Higher Education and Research Act 2017 to the attention of students annually; and
b) draw the attention of students to this Code of Practice and the accompanying statement annually.
5.5. The University shall also:
a) ensure that this Code of Practice is brought to the attention of new students at registration and new staff during induction;
b) ensure that all staff receive training on freedom of speech and academic freedom;
c) periodically survey staff, students and other stakeholders to secure their views on whether freedom of speech and academic freedom at the institution are being adequately protected and take the findings into account;
d) ensure that there are adequate measures in place to raise concerns about freedom of speech and academic freedom;
e) ensure that when new policies and procedures are introduced consideration is given to their impact on freedom of speech and academic freedom; and
f) monitor any concerns that have been raised about freedom of speech and academic freedom to ensure that they are addressed so far as is reasonably practical and that any lessons learned are incorporated into a review of relevant policies practices and procedures; and
g) take steps to secure compliance with this Code of Practice, including where appropriate disciplinary action.
5.6. In assessing its compliance with its duties, the University shall apply a three-step framework when assessing any measure or decision that might affect freedom of speech, as follows:
- Step 1 – an assessment as to whether the speech is within the law.
- If yes, it will consider Step 2.
- If no, the duty to secure free speech does not apply.
- Step 2 – consideration as to whether there are any reasonably practicable steps (positive or negative) to secure the speech.
- If yes, those steps shall be taken.
- If no, the University will consider Step 3.
The following, amongst other considerations, are unlikely to be relevant when considering what steps are reasonably practicable:
- the viewpoint that any affected speech expresses, including but not limited to:
- whether it aligns with University’s aims or values;
- whether it is controversial or offensive;
- whether external or internal groups (for example alumni, donors, lobbyists, domestic or foreign governments, staff or students) approve of the viewpoint that the speech expresses.
- the reputational impact of any affected speech on the University.
Legal and regulatory obligations may affect whether a step is reasonably practicable. Where the University is required by law not to do something, then doing it (e.g. permitting the speech) would be unlawful and therefore not reasonably practicable. Consideration will also be given as to whether any steps or speech interfere with the essential functions of the University and whether there is any credible evidence that they may give rise to concerns about physical safety.
- Step 3 – if there are no reasonably practicable steps to secure speech, the University will ensure that its restrictions are prescribed by law and proportionate under the European Convention on Human Rights.
- If yes, the restrictions shall be implemented.
- If no, the restrictions shall not be implemented as this would be inconsistent with the University’s free speech duties.